Entr 200 Assign. 6

In addition to wages you will pay to a new employee, other costs will be incurred. For this assignment, determine the total cost of one new employee.

  • What is the annual salary of this new position? How did you arrive at this amount.
  • What is the benefit package you would offer this new employee? What is the cost of this benefits package?
  • What is the total cost of one employee: salary + benefits (financial and non-financial benefits?
  • How does this salary and benefit package benefit both the employee and the business?

This should be in a word document; APA formatted, using Times new Roman 12 point font, and includes at least two references backing up your assertions.

Program Evaluation

For this assignment, write a 6–8 page paper on program evaluation based upon the Riverbend City scenario presented in this unit’s study. Distinguish the three different types of program evaluation and identify each of their functions, goals, and processes. Use the Riverbend City scenario to highlight specifically how these different program evaluations are being used and critique how multiple stakeholder perspectives are integrated to meet specific population needs, and how ethics are maintained in the process.

Be sure to address the following:

  • Identify three types of program evaluation that were presented in the Riverbend City scenario.
    • Describe the three types of program evaluation and their application in the scenario.
  • Assess the program, utilizing the three types of program evaluations from the Riverbend City scenario.
  • Examine ethical issues that arise in program evaluation, using at least two ethical standards from the National Organization of Human Services.
  • Critique each program evaluation’s use of multiple stakeholders’ perspectives in determining their effectiveness for meeting the needs of special populations.

Your work should integrate the Riverbend City media presentation and references to your required readings. You are encouraged to support this paper with additional reputable sources.

 

 
Week 5 Assignment – Program Evaluation
Criteria Ratings Pts
Assess program quality using standards-based evaluation.

view longer description

36 to >30.6 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Critiques the implementation of standards-based evaluation in assessing program quality, highlighting its effectiveness in meeting the needs of specific stakeholders and/or diverse populations.

30.6 to >25.2 pts

PROFICIENT

Assesses program quality using standards-based evaluation.

25.2 to >0 pts

BASIC

Describes standards-based evaluation conceptually or in application in a specified scenario, but does not assess it in relation to program quality.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not address program quality using standards-based evaluation.

/ 36 pts
Assess program efficiency and effectiveness using process evaluation.

view longer description

36 to >30.6 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Critiques the implementation of process evaluation in assessing program efficiency and its effectiveness in meeting the needs of specific stakeholders and/or populations.

30.6 to >25.2 pts

PROFICIENT

Assesses program efficiency and effectiveness using process evaluation.

25.2 to >0 pts

BASIC

Describes process evaluation conceptually or in application in a specified scenario, but does not assess it in relation to program efficiency and effectiveness.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not address program efficiency and effectiveness using process evaluation.

/ 36 pts
Assess program effectiveness using outcome evaluation.

view longer description

36 to >30.6 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Critiques the implementation of outcome evaluation in assessing program effectiveness in meeting the needs of specific stakeholders and/or diverse populations.

30.6 to >25.2 pts

PROFICIENT

Assesses program effectiveness using outcome evaluation.

25.2 to >0 pts

BASIC

Describes outcome evaluation conceptually or in application in a specified scenario, but does not assess it in relation to program effectiveness.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not describe program effectiveness using outcome evaluation.

/ 36 pts
Examine what ethical issues arise in conducting program evaluation.

view longer description

28 to >23.8 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Critiques the application of several ethical standards when conducting program evaluation in a specified scenario.

23.8 to >19.6 pts

PROFICIENT

Examines what ethical issues arise in conducting program evaluation.

19.6 to >0 pts

BASIC

Highlights ethical issues, but does not specifically link them to the program evaluation presented in a specified scenario.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not identify what ethical issues arise in conducting program evaluation.

/ 28 pts
Critique how each type of program evaluation utilizes multiple stakeholder perspectives.

view longer description

28 to >23.8 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Critiques how each type of program evaluation addresses diversity through multiple stakeholder perspectives, accessibility, and culturally sensitive approaches.

23.8 to >19.6 pts

PROFICIENT

Critiques how each type of program evaluation utilizes multiple stakeholder perspectives.

19.6 to >0 pts

BASIC

Discusses multiple stakeholder perspectives, relating some aspects regarding accessibility or culturally sensitive approaches used in program evaluation, but does not critique them.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not discuss how each type of program evaluation utilizes multiple stakeholder perspectives.

/ 28 pts
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.

view longer description

36 to >30.6 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, is consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession, and is supported with reputable sources.

30.6 to >25.2 pts

PROFICIENT

Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.

25.2 to >0 pts

BASIC

Communicates with persistent writing errors that impede the message or includes language the is not respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.

 

A5

Case Study

 

Zoe

Zoe is the only child of Sarah and Martha. Zoe is 8 months old and has Down Syndrome. This was discovered at birth as neither parent wanted prenatal testing. Martha was very upset with this news and has had a very difficult time interacting and engaging with Zoe. Martha tends to leave most of the parenting to Sarah. Martha is an engineer and is often required to travel for her work and Sarah is an occupational therapist in an elder care complex. Sarah is at home with Zoe for now but plans to return to work as soon as Zoe is one year old. The family has not decided on what care arrangement will be made once Sarah returns to work.

This family lives in Vancouver and have a very extensive family and friend network. Sarah’s parents and siblings live in Vancouver as well and are often at the home when you, the Infant Development Consultant, visit the home.

Sarah demonstrates a strong attachment to Zoe and is very involved in not only caregiving tasks for Zoe but is also keen to implement as many therapeutic interventions as possible. She researchers extensively on the internet and asks you many questions and has lots of suggestions during the visits.

While the parents differ in their attachment and care with Zoe, they feel very strongly that they want all correspondence and meetings concerning Zoe to retain a gender- neutral stance as well as the language used in home visit reports and all documentation to be gender neutral.

Zoe had a very healthy birthweight but has not been gaining weight as anticipated. Zoe has a heart murmur so that is being monitored very closely. Zoe’s hearing is fine but visual acuity and field is not yet determined.

You have had several visits with Sarah and Zoe (and various extended family members) but Martha has not been able attend any visits. Sarah has told you that Martha thinks that Zoe should just be left alone and will develop at whatever rate and pace they need to.

 

 

 

1.

Before answering the question, reflect on your personal experience in a situation you were working collaboratively with someone or a group/ team. How did you and the other person/people contribute? What occurred that was helpful/effective? How were you engaged/supported in the process? Think about what you valued and learned and apply it to the following case and question.

Using the case study you have been given, as part of the early intervention services another professional has been engaged by the family. This could be a speech therapist, an occupational therapist, physiotherapist or behavior consultant depending on your case study.

After visiting with the family for a few weeks, the therapist approaches you and states that they do not agree with the course of action you or the family are taking, they are concerned the child is not meeting developmental goals and that they want to suggest stopping the intervention all together.

Stand in the shoes of each role:  

  • As the parents/caregivers in your case study: What are the issues/concerns from your point of view? 
  • As the therapist: What are the issues from their point of view?

Using the same scenario as question 1:

Using the case study you have been given, as part of the early intervention services another professional has been engaged by the family. This could be a speech therapist, an occupational therapist, physiotherapist or behavior consultant depending on your case study.

After visiting with the family for a few weeks, the therapist approaches you and states that they do not agree with the course of action you or the family are taking, they are concerned the child is not meeting developmental goals and that they want to suggest stopping the intervention all together. 

Reflect and think about your experience and reaction taking both roles. Discuss what you noticed about your thoughts or feelings in each role? How did taking both roles/viewpoints effect how you might approach challenging or difficult situations in the future?

 

3.

Watch the video Resolving Differences: Engaging all LearnersLinks to an external site.   (Video 7- Resolving Differences through Collaboration)  and use the information from the readings and lesson 8 regarding collaborative goal setting and resolving differences. Before answering the question, put yourself in the parents’ shoes and think about what you would want to hear or have happen so you were included and part of the solutions.

What aspects of collaboration/resolution in the video were not effective for the parents and why? Discuss collaborative and resolution skills you might use in this situation to include/engage them.

 

4.

Based on the video Resolving Differences: Engaging all LearnersLinks to an external site.  (Video 7- Resolving differences through Collaboration) and using the information from the readings and lesson 8 regarding collaborative goal setting and resolving differences, answer the following question. Remember to put yourself in the parents’ shoes and think about what you would want to hear or have happen so you were included and part of the solutions.

Provide a specific participatory family-centred example of the key understandings listed in the video that demonstrate what you might do for each in practice with this family.

View keyboard shortcuts

EditViewInsertFormatToolsTable

12pt

Paragraph

 

5.

In ‘Service Delivery to Parents With Intellectual Disabilities‘, key parents shared their experiences regarding helpful and unhelpful aspects of service delivery.

What aspects are important to consider/include when supporting a parent with their child to ensure it is helpful, and what do you need to avoid being unhelpful?

 

6.

The reading about adults with intellectual disabilities and decision-making in lesson 9 highlighted points about respect for persons, as well as the issues of asymmetrical power and outer-directedness. Taking these into account, read the following scenario:

Mary is a mother with an intellectual challenge. The prescription drug she took for seizures during pregnancy affected her child Joseph who also suffers from seizures and cognitive and mild motor delays. You have been supporting Mary and Joseph for a few months at home and at a local daycare to give Mary a break and Joseph time with other children. You are concerned because lately Mary has not brought Joseph, and he seems less active and alert than usual. You decide to call Mary to see if she is open to a visit at home to check in. She is willing to see you the next day.

On arrival at the house at noon, it takes awhile for Mary to answer the door. Once inside, it appears that Joseph may still be in his crib, Mary isn’t dressed and it looks like they haven’t been up yet. There are numerous dishes and household items lying around, and Mary does not seem as vibrant as usual. She is often excited to talk about Joseph and his progress of things he does. He typically brings a smile to her face. Mary seems low energy, and Joseph appears to have low affect and energy and is very lethargic.

This is concerning given his seizure/medical situation. You ask Mary how he has been and she mentions he has had a few seizure episodes that have lasted longer than usual and then he falls asleep. She did not want to disturb him so left him in bed. It appears that Mary has not been playing/doing much with Joseph based on what she shares and that his seizure activity has increased lately and lasts longer. You are concerned that this situation could or is becoming non-stimulating and less social and active for them both. 

Discuss what you need to consider when working with Mary given the issues of asymmetrical power and outer-directedness.

 

7.

Based on Mary’s scenario, answer the following question.

Mary is a mother with an intellectual challenge. The prescription drug she took for seizures during pregnancy affected her child Joseph who also suffers from seizures and cognitive and mild motor delays. You have been supporting Mary and Joseph for a few months at home and at a local daycare to give Mary a break and Joseph time with other children. You are concerned because lately Mary has not brought Joseph, and he seems less active and alert than usual. You decide to call Mary to see if she is open to a visit at home to check in. She is willing to see you the next day.

On arrival at the house at noon, it takes awhile for Mary to answer the door. Once inside, it appears that Joseph may still be in his crib, Mary isn’t dressed and it looks like they haven’t been up yet. There are numerous dishes and household items lying around, and Mary does not seem as vibrant as usual. She is often excited to talk about Joseph and his progress of things he does. He typically brings a smile to her face. Mary seems low energy, and Joseph appears to have low affect and energy and is very lethargic.

This is concerning given his seizure/medical situation. You ask Mary how he has been and she mentions he has had a few seizure episodes that have lasted longer than usual and then he falls asleep. She did not want to disturb him so left him in bed. It appears that Mary has not been playing/doing much with Joseph based on what she shares and that his seizure activity has increased lately and lasts longer. You are concerned that this situation could or is becoming non-stimulating and less social and active for them both.  

Describe what you need to consider and do to help Mary make decisions and get supports to manage Joseph, and to respond to the potential crisis/change in his care.

View keyboard shortcuts

EditViewInsertFormatToolsTable

12pt

Paragraph

 

8.

Lesson 10 and the readings focused on ethical issues confronting us in relation to our work with children and families. Do no harm and having their best interests in mind is key to ethical decision-making. Ethical issues require us to explore a variety of perspectives in order to make an objective, ethical decision on behalf of another person. This involves weighing multiple options/viewpoints, and their potential consequence and impact on others before making the decision.

Continuing to use the case scenario of Mary, and the following steps modified from “7 Steps to Making Decisions”, discuss your process of how you will work through an ethical issue and make a decision through each step. You are encouraged to incorporate any content from the readings/lesson that relate and help you to work through the issues to make your decision.

  1. What is the dilemma: Pose the issues in this case.
  2. Ethical perspectives: Pose some of your own questions based on each of the 4 perspectives: your personal beliefs/values; justice; critique, care; and professionalism.
  3. Possible 2-3 solutions: Pose some solutions for the issues and state why you chose them.
  4. Consequences: Discuss/weigh the effect of each solution and who is affected by them.
  5. Rank/Prioritize: Rank your solutions in order of choice and who should be involved. Now make your decisionand state the reason you chose it.
  6. Monitor/Modify:  State how you will monitor the decision.

 

Mary is a mother with an intellectual challenge. The prescription drug she took for seizures during pregnancy affected her child Joseph who also suffers from seizures and cognitive and mild motor delays. You have been supporting Mary and Joseph for a few months at home and at a local daycare to give Mary a break and Joseph time with other children. You are concerned because lately Mary has not brought Joseph, and he seems less active and alert than usual. You decide to call Mary to see if she is open to a visit at home to check in. She is willing to see you the next day.

On arrival at the house at noon, it takes awhile for Mary to answer the door. Once inside, it appears that Joseph may still be in his crib, Mary isn’t dressed and it looks like they haven’t been up yet. There are numerous dishes and household items lying around, and Mary does not seem as vibrant as usual. She is often excited to talk about Joseph and his progress of things he does. He typically brings a smile to her face. Mary seems low energy, and Joseph appears to have low affect and energy and is very lethargic.

This is concerning given his seizure/medical situation. You ask Mary how he has been and she mentions he has had a few seizure episodes that have lasted longer than usual and then he falls asleep. She did not want to disturb him so left him in bed. It appears that Mary has not been playing/doing much with Joseph based on what she shares and that his seizure activity has increased lately and lasts longer. You are concerned that this situation could or is becoming non-stimulating and less social and active for them both.

View keyboard shortcuts

EditViewInsertFormatToolsTable

12pt

Paragraph

 

 

Case Study (Cooper)

In this assignment, you will review a case study about a 12-year-old boy diagnosed with a Conduct Disorder.

Read: Case 15-1 “Doesn’t Know the Rules” found in the DSM Library to include the Discussion section.

Answer the following:

  • What additional information would you want to know about Kyle and why?
  • How would you go about gathering the information?
  • What approaches to treatment would you use? Explain why for each treatment approach
  • Reflect  on the diagnostic process that evolved over the course of time. Do you  think Kyle’s diagnosis will change in the future? Why or why not?
  • What are two resources that you would recommend to Kyle’s parents to help them to better understand his behavior and diagnosis.

WEEK 7 ORG 827 STUDENT RESPONSES

ORG 827 WEEK 7  STUDENT REPONSES

ORIGINAL QUESTION – Some assert it is imperative for leaders to be bold when making strategic decisions. How does a leader determine how much risk is acceptable when making a decision? Explain.

 

STUDENT 1- KAREN-

In the realm of leadership, assertiveness and boldness have emerged as crucial qualities when it comes to making strategic decisions ‌(Lynch & Benson, 2023). The ability to confidently and decisively navigate complex situations sets exceptional leaders apart ‌(Lynch & Benson, 2023). By embracing assertiveness and boldness, leaders can inspire their teams, drive innovation, and achieve remarkable success ‌(Jung et al., 2020). Leaders are constantly faced with decisions involving risk ‌(Jung et al., 2020)‌. Determining how much risk is acceptable can be challenging, as it requires a delicate balance between seizing opportunities and protecting the organization’s interests ‌(Jung et al., 2020).

One crucial factor in assessing acceptable risk is understanding the organization’s overall goals and objectives ‌(Jung et al., 2020). A leader must have a clear vision of their goal and align their decision-making process accordingly ‌(Jung et al., 2020). ‌By evaluating whether the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks, leaders can make informed choices that propel their organization forward ‌(Jung et al., 2020).

 

Another critical consideration is conducting a thorough analysis of the available information ‌(Jung et al., 2020)‌. Leaders must gather and evaluate all relevant data objectively to gauge the potential outcomes and associated risks ‌(Jung et al., 2020). Measuring possible effects and associated risks includes examining market trends, competitor strategies, financial implications, and other factors that may impact the decision ‌(Jung et al., 2020).

 

Jung, K. B., Kang, S.-W., & Choi, S. B. (2020). Empowering leadership, risk-taking behavior, and employees’ commitment to organizational change: The mediated moderating role of task complexity. Sustainability12(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062340

 

 

 

STUDENT 2- KENYON

Risk is something that a leader who must answer to a board of directors needs to be based on the issue at hand. The amount of risk a leader takes will be connected to innovation and creativity. Risk-taking might be part of the culture, depending on the organization’s size. If an organization is small to medium, the risk-taking environment is just part of the norms of the entity (Rahaman et al., 2021). Leadership, especially when migrating into new markets, calls for risk. Regarding larger organizations, risk-taking can be conducted differently than in small or medium-sized organizations. Smaller organizations can be more ambidextrous to maneuver, but larger firms have more systems and processes. With larger organizations, leaders must get internal stakeholders, such as employees, and external stakeholders, such as shareholders, to buy in due to the change that is taking place (Shad et al., 2019). Risk-taking is inevitable, but depending on the situation, any leader should take the time to investigate the amount of risk to be taken.

References

Ferreira de Araújo Lima, P., Crema, M., &Verbano, C. (2020). Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions. European Management Journal38(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STUDENT 3- TIMOTHY

Determining the acceptable level of risk when making strategic decisions involves a careful assessment of various factors. A leader should consider the potential impact and consequences of the decision, how much risk the organization is willing to assume, the available resources and capabilities, and the overall business environment. By conducting a thorough risk analysis, a leader can evaluate the likelihood of success and failure for each option. They must weigh the potential benefits of being bold and taking risks against the potential drawbacks and negative outcomes (Bennett, et al., 2020). A key aspect is understanding the organization’s acceptance for risk, which varies based on its industry, financial stability, and long-term goals.

Effective leaders should also rely on data and insights to make informed decisions, using past experiences, market research, and expert opinions. Engaging stakeholders and seeking diverse perspectives can help in gaining a holistic view of the potential risks involved. Ultimately, striking the right balance between confidence and carefulness is vital. Leaders must be ready to take calculated risks that align with the organization’s vision and goals, while also being prepared to adapt and adjust their approach based on new information or changing circumstances.

Bennett, M. R., Ogutu, J., &Olawoyin, R. (2020). Intelligent risk management: seven practical steps to a strong risk culture & financial maturity. Professional Safety, 65(5), 33–38. https://eds-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&sid=e6100795-822e-487b-b741-5f811d287f1c%40redis

 

Teaching Effective Presentation Skills Power point Quay

This  project requires you to develop a PowerPoint slide presentation for use  as a training tool with managers and supervisors on preparing an  effective presentation. As you move up through the workforce, you will,  at some point, be required to give a briefing or presentation to others.  Hopefully, one day you will also be able to develop one of your  worker’s speaking and presentation skills. There is great satisfaction  in taking a nervous employee, helping them to develop their  presentation, coaching them on delivery, and then watching them knock it  out of the park! With this in mind, your presentation should briefly  outline (i.e., no more than 2-3 slides) how to start a presentation  (attention-getting steps) and provide an overview for the audience. You  should focus most of your presentation (i.e., 8-10 slides) on what makes  an effective presentation. Factors to consider in all forms of  communication–Who is your audience? What is your message? Are you  trying to persuade? Inform? Week 5, Lesson 1 has a lot of great  information to get you started, as well as the Forum in Week 4 (the Guy  Kawasaki TED Talk).

Here  are some guidelines to get you started: You will brief a small group of  newly graduated APUS Business Students on how to present an effective  presentation. Your audience ages are anywhere from 20-60 years of age,  with various business backgrounds, military experience, and even some  small business owners.

Revise All Areas 2

EDD Prospectus Form

 

Students | Complete your  EDD project study or EdD  dissertation prospectus using this form. Write using a scholarly tone and include in-text citations and APA 7 reference entries, where appropriate. Note that the areas shaded in green provide directions to help you complete the  form .Your responses should be inserted in the white areas. The stem sentence prompts should not be altered or removed as this helps you to write a grammatically correct problem and purpose statements. Words noted with an asterisk *can be clicked on to view additional resources.  You will find the appropriate rubric standards mentioned several times as you must meet all rubric standards to pass the prospectus milestone.

 

For additional resources, refer to the Doctoral Research Coach* and the Walden EDD Doctoral Study*webpage. Submit this completed form into Task stream/ MyDR*for formal evaluation and feedback when your committee chair indicates that you are ready to do so.

 

Student’s Name Angel Winslow                                    Student ID | A01033383

Study Type | Dissertation Study Approach| Qualitative

Will the data be collected within a local setting? | No If yes, review the IRB Website*, including the “red flag” section.

Program and Specialization*|Early Childhood Education        Submission Date|6/4/2023

*Remember that your study focus must be within the realm of your program and specialization area .If there are any questions or concerns about the appropriateness of the study topic, please reach out to your chair to discuss. Your chair can reach out to the program coordinator for clarification if needed.

 

Rubric Standard #1 | Complete >Does the research plan contain all the required elements?

 

 
 

Title* (Click on this title to be linked to more information)

Provide a concise (aim for 15 words or fewer) working title for this study.  Include the main topic, variables/concepts under investigation, and the relationship between them. A title should be fully explanatory when standing alone and needs to include the most critical key words. Do not use colons and do not write a question.

Have one specific name for your concept or variables throughout your document to ensure alignment.

 
“The Impact of Virtual Learning in Pre-K Setting”  
 

Supporting Literature* (Click on this title to be linked to more information)

The first step in developing your study is to search the literature*related to the general area you want to investigate. Provide approximately 15 brief summaries of recent (within the past 5 years), scholarly (peer-reviewed*) articles that support/justify/informs your current and relevant problem from your discipline or professional field and/or local setting. Dissertations and other capstones are not peer-reviewed sources. Include the complete APA 7 reference entry followed by(a) an in-text citation; (b) what was studied; (c) what was found; and (d) why this research is important in relation to your study. This evidence provides the justification for your research problem.

 
   
(a)Rahayu, R. P., &Wirza, Y. (2020). Teachers’ perception of online learning during pandemic covid-19. Jornnal Penelitian Pendidikan20(3), 392-406.  Doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.018 

(b) The study investigates the attitudes of early childhood educators toward online education during the COVID-19 epidemic(Rahayu &Wirza, 2020). (c) The results demonstrate that educators had numerous challenges while implementing online instruction, including issues with technology, low student engagement, and inadequate assessment.  (d) This research connects with my study by highlighting the need for expanded professional development opportunities for educators interested in implementing online learning strategies with preschoolers.

 

(a)    Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems49(1), 5-22.

Doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

(b)During the recent COVID-19 pandemic, online schooling has been met with both praise and criticism (Dhawan, 2020).(c) Online education, the author argues, has the ability to provide a more adaptable and personalized education, but it also has significant limitations, such as insufficient infrastructure and unreliable connections.  (d) This article connects to my study by  providing context for the benefits and drawbacks of e-learning for young children with implementing technology-based instruction for young children.

 

(a)    Simamora, R. M. (2020). The challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.38

(b)   The challenges of online education, such as low student engagement and ineffective group projects, are discussed (Simamora, 2020).  (c) In light of the findings, it is clear that online education has promise, but caution must be exercised in its design to ensure its success. (d)This research connects to my study  because it highlights the critical importance of meticulously planning and implementing all aspects of an organization’s online infrastructure.

 

(a)    Yu, Z. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effect of virtual reality technology use in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10494820.2021.1989466

(b)   This systematic review investigated the Impact of virtual reality on learning and trainee satisfaction during technical skill development (Yu, 2021). (c) Virtual reality has been shown to improve student learning and satisfaction with technical skill instruction. Further study is needed to determine how virtual reality could be used in other sectors, but this one illustrates how it could be used to educate technical skills. (d) This article connects to my study by  highlighting the significance of investigating the potential applications of virtual reality in early childhood education.

 

(a)    Rulyansah, A., Ghufron, S., & Mariati, P. (2023). Competencies of teachers in game-based pedagogy. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction13(2), 354-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.39

(b)   The research analyzed how future educators accessed and utilized a virtual professional learning community for educators (Rulyansah et al., 2023). (c) The findings point to the online teacher community as a potential resource for training new educators to effectively integrate technology into the classroom. (d) The research connects to my study by investigating the significance of training future educators to use technology in the classroom, as well as the role that online communities play in assisting current educators in their professional development. This study is significant because it demonstrates the value of online communities for fostering professional development in early childhood education and highlights the significance of providing teachers with opportunities to learn about the classroom application of technology,

 

(a)    Wineburg, S., Breakstone, J., McGrew, S., Smith, M. D., & Ortega, T. (2022). Lateral reading on the open Internet: A district-wide field study in high school government classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 893-909. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000740

(b)   In their discussion of urban legends in education, Wineburg et al. (2022) cast doubt on the common belief that students know best. Many widely held views regarding schooling are shown to be unfounded by the findings. (c) The article emphasizes the significance of teaching using evidence and challenging accepted dogma in the classroom. (d) The article connects to my study  because it debunks some of the most pervasive misunderstandings about online education and demonstrates the significance of employing research-based practices in the formative years of education.

 

(a)    Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., &Stürmer, K. (2019). A test-based approach of modeling and measuring technological pedagogical knowledge. Computers & Education142, 103645. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103645

(b)   The study analyzed the factors including instructor expertise, confidence, beliefs, and culture that influence the adoption of new technologies in the classroom (Lachner et al., 2019). (c) Teachers were more willing to use technological tools into their lessons if they shared students’ enthusiasm for and belief in their usefulness. (d) This research connects to my study because it examines the elements that influence educators’ choices to implement virtual learning strategies in preschool settings.

 

(a)    Mohebi, L., &Meda, L. (2021). Trainee teachers’ perceptions of online teaching during field experience with young children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(6), 1189-1198. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01235-9

(b)   The study focused on the perception of trainee teachers when towards online teaching with handling learners in early childhood setting  (Mohebi&Meda, 2021). (c) According to this study it also considers the perceptions of faculty supervisors who work with the trainee teachers. The study considered the experiences of the teachers, families, and supervisors towards the effectiveness of virtual learning in early childhood education. (d) The article connects to my study because it covers the concepts of virtual learning, challenges, perceptions, and experiences which form the basis for this research.

 

(a)    Vallée, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., & Sorbets, E. (2020). Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: Systematic Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8). https://doi.org/10.2196/16504

(b)   Blended learning was investigated in this study (Vallée et al., 2020) in primary schools. (c) The effectiveness of students’ education could be enhanced by implementing blended learning strategies, although doing so is challenging for pedagogical, technological, and social reasons. (d) This research connects to my study because it demonstrates the potential advantages of blended learning, which mixes online and in-person training, and highlights the challenges that must be addressed before this type of technology can be successfully implemented in preschool and kindergarten settings.

 

(a)    Gjelaj, M., Buza, K., Shatri, K., &; Zabeli, N. (2020). Digital Technologies in early childhood: Attitudes and practices of parents and teachers in Kosovo. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13111a.

(b)   Preschool educators’ attitudes on technology integration were studied by Gjelaj et al. (2002o).  (c) The study discovered that teachers’ perspectives changed depending on factors like their own familiarity with educational technology, the availability of resources, and the encouragement they received from their peers. (d) This research connects to my study  because it demonstrates the value of providing resources to teachers of young children so that they, too, can expand their knowledge of technology.

 

(a)    Alshaikhi, H. I. (2020). Self-directed teacher professional development in Saudi Arabia: EFL teachers’ perceptions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(11), 1359. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1011.03

(b)   This article (Alshaikhi, 2020) uses a sociocultural lens to investigate the perceptions of Saudi EFL teachers toward continuing online education. Sociocultural elements, such as cultural values and social conventions, were found to influence teachers’ engagement in professional development programs. (c) This research demonstrates the Impact of cultural norms and practices on students’ ability to learn with and benefit from technological tools. (d) The article connects to my study because it highlights the need for sociocultural considerations to be integrated into training plans for professionals.

 

(a)    Ikhsan, K. (2020). Technology acceptance model, social influence and perceived risk in using mobile applications: Empirical evidence in online transportation in Indonesia. JurnalDinamikaManajemen, 11(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v11i2.23309

(b)   This research contributes to the TAM by investigating the role of peer pressure and risk aversion in consumers’ decisions to use mobile payment systems (Ikhsan, 2020). (c) TAM was discovered that social influence and perceived risk have a significant role in determining a user’s propensity to engage in mobile payment, in addition to the TAM criteria.  (d) This research connects to my study because it demonstrates that the TAM may be extended to incorporate additional elements that drive technology use, such as social pressure and perceived risk.

 

(a)    Plotka, R., & Guirguis, R. (2022). Distance learning in early childhood during the COVID-19 crisis: Family and educators’ experiences. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01384-5

(b)   Plotka and Guirguis (2022) conducted a study that delved on the challenges of educating early childhood learners online during the COVID-19 pandemic. (c) The study considered the challenges that were experienced by early childhood educators and the parents of early childhood learners. Parents have the view that online or virtual learning was less effective as compared to the traditional approach of a classroom setting. (d) This research connects with my study because  it highlights some of the challenges associated with teachers that had the view that virtual learning could become effective.

 

(a)    Fenderson, D. G. (2022). From in-person to online teaching. Research Anthology on Remote Teaching and Learning and the Future of Online Education, 2074–2102. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7540-9.ch104

 

(c)    Many teachers in the US were obliged to use online teaching techniques to instruct their kids remotely as a result of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions (Fenderson, 2022).  © The examination of the literature looks at the conventional distinctions between teaching online and in-person courses, the difficulties involved, and how instructors see online learning. Teachers of ninth through twelfth grade in a North Texas school district were surveyed about their experiences using online instruction before and during the pandemic in order to gather data for the study. (d) The article connects with my study by factors like a teacher school campus, prior experience, and access to support structures correlated more to teachers having a high level of preparedness for online teaching.

 

 

 

(a)    Ceballos, M., Vitale, T., & Gordon, W. R. (2021). Remote continuity of learning and the COVID-19 pandemic: Educators  self-perceptions of preparedness. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 3(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.2021271304

 

(b)   The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted education systems in February 2020 as schools ceased in-person instruction and switched to virtual learning to slow the disease’s spread within local communities (Ceballos et al., 2021). (c) We aimed to investigate differences in teacher and educational leader self-perceptions of preparedness for remote continuity of learning and communicating with stakeholders, factors contributing to preparedness, and suggested needs in upcoming educational leadership preparation as school systems implemented remote learning. (d) This article connects to my study because  contributes to an understanding of teacher and educational leader preparedness for remote learning at the start of the COVID-19 crisis.

 

.

 
Rubric Standard | Justified>Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field, and local site if applicable? The prospectus should provide relevant statistics and evidence and other scholarly facts that point to the significance and urgency of the problem.

 

 

Research Problem*(Click on this title to be linked to more information)

Now that you have read and summarized some of the recent literature to understand your problem, in one sentence what is your research problem? *  Please remember that for a project studyyour problem must relate to a meaningful gap*in practice.Dissertation must relate to a meaningful gap in the research about a practice.

The problem for this study is that teachers struggle to effectively engage in virtual learning.
 

 

Rubric Standard #2 | Meaningful >Has a meaningful problem related to practice been identified in the research literature, and local site if applicable? Addressing the stated problem should be the logical next step, building on what is already known, and staying within the student’s area of professional practice.

Rubric Standard #5 | Original >Does this planned capstone have the potential to make an original contribution? Addressing the problem should result in an original contribution to the field and/or local site.

Rubric Standard #9| Objective >Is the topic approached in an objective manner? The framing of the problem should not reveal bias or present foregone conclusions.

 

Please provide three pieces of evidence below to show that the problem is meaningful to the discipline and research literature. If the study is a project study or a dissertation that uses a local setting as the data collection site, evidence must also be included to justify the use of the local setting. For a dissertation not using a local site, at least three pieces of evidence from the research literature must be presented.
 

Due to the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic, teachers had to transition to teaching virtually.  However they adapted to the unprecedented situation and made significant efforts to provide virtual learning activities (Steed & Leech, 2021). Virtual learning, especially at a young age, can be detrimental to a child’s social and emotional development since it limits face-to-face contact (Ferri, 2020) This demonstrates the necessity to design online learning environments that provide young kids with the same level of social and emotional support they would receive in a traditional classroom setting.There is increased demand on elementary school instructors to include virtual learning because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Many children were sent home to study, necessitating a rapid adaptation of teaching strategies. The challenges that educators already confront shed light on the difficulty of implementing online education for preschoolers (Peimani&Kamalipour, 2021). This demonstrates the significance of addressing these concerns if we wish to maintain the use of virtual learning in preschool settings.

 

Peimani, N., &Kamalipour, H. (2021). Online education and the COVID-19 outbreak: A case study of online teaching during lockdown. Education Sciences11(2), 72.

Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies10(4), 86.

Steed, E. A., & Leech, N. (2021). Shifting to remote learning during covid-19: Differences for early childhood and early childhood special education teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01218-w

 

 

Rubric Standard #3 | Justified >Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field, and local site if applicable? The prospectus should provide relevant statistics and evidence and other scholarly facts that point to the significance and urgency of the problem.

 

 

Purpose*(Click on this title to be linked to more information)

To address your stated research problem, what is the purpose of your study? Will you describe, compare, determine, explore, examine, etc.? Complete the purpose sentence below and be sure to clarify your variables/concepts of interest.Your purpose statement should reflect and align* to your problem statement.

Rubric Standard #8 | Aligned >Do the various aspects of the research plan align? To ensure a solid foundation is built at the prospectus stage, alignment is needed among all study elements including the problem and purpose statements, evidence, framework, research questions, and methodology.

 

 

Framework (Conceptual or Theoretical)*(Click on this title to be linked to more information)

What theory(ies) and/or concept(s) support (frame) your study and who are the original author(s)? Provide an in-text citation with your response, and the complete APA reference entry with a summary in the Supporting Literature section. Please note that a conceptual framework aligns with a qualitative study, a theoretical framework aligns with a quantitative study, and for a mixed method study it may be either depending on the design so please confer with the methodologist on your committee.

 

                        The study will use a conceptual framework. A conceptual framework as described by Luft et al. (2022) in their article that investigated the difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks, is a amalgamation of concepts that contribute to the understanding of the research topic, question and research problem. The key concepts of this study are virtual learning, teachers’ perception, early childhood education, and academic success. Teachers experience challenges in their efforts to use virtual learning in early childhood settings. These challenges impede the realization of academic success in early childhood settings. Their perceptions of these challenges form the basis of understanding how the problems can be solved.

A study by Rahayu and Wirza, (2020) looked at the perceptions of teachers on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study looked at the attitudes of early childhood educators during the COVID-19 pandemic. The perceptions of the teachers were analyzed into three facets that included perceived ease of use of technology, usefulness, and their attitude towards online learning of English language. Furthermore, online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic proved to be very useful especially to the online tutors. Due to the lockdown across several nations many people in different industries and careers lost their jobs and could not manage to put food on the table. As for the online tutors, they still maintained a source of income through teaching students online. It was also convenient for them since they were in touch with their students during the lockdown and they were able to track and proceed with the annual academic progress. The results of the study showed that teachers reflected a positive perception towards ease of online learning and usefulness of technology. It also enabled them to be occupied during this period when most of the individuals were idle at home and ended up experiencing a mental breakdown. The study by Rahayu and  Wirza, (2020) not only provides  the literature related to the topic, but also covers the concepts that fall within the conceptual framework of the study.

Whereas Rahayu and Wirza (2020) focused on perceptions and attitudes of teachers on online learning, Kearney et al. (2018) looked that barriers that impede adoption of technology in education. The study identifies factors such as accessibility, lack of professional support, and ease of use are some of the barriers. Other than looking at the barriers, the study by Kearney et al. (2018) established that primary or elementary school teachers were using technology in diverse ways while secondary teachers were mainly using technology during presentation. The study covers the concept of challenges associated with the use of technology in education. It aligns with the current study which looks at the challenges teachers encounter when using virtual learning in early childhood settings.

Another study that covers the concepts which form the conceptual framework of the current study is Simamora (2020) who looked at the challenges linked to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study analyzed the essays presented by students on the challenges of online learning. 15 students participated in the research exercise. The participants were learners who were actively engaged in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges that learners faced during online learning were considered. Problems such as anxiety and accessibility among learners dominated the list of challenges.

References

 

Luft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R., & Gardner, G. (2022). Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction         for new biology education researchers. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(3), rm33.

Plotka, R., & Guirguis, R. (2022). Distance learning in early childhood during the COVID-19 Crisis: Family and educators’ experiences.           Early Childhood Education Journal, 1-12.Doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01384-5

Rahayu, R. P., &Wirza, Y. (2020). Teachers’ perception of online learning during pandemic covid-19. JurnalPenelitianPendidikan20(3), 392-        406

Simamora, R. M. (2020). The Challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education             students. Studies in Learning and Teaching1(2), 86-103

 

How do these theory(ies) and/or concept(s)inform your research problem, purpose, and methodological decisions?
            The conceptual framework of the study informs the research problem, research purpose, and methodological approach. The framework shows the connection that exists between the concepts. Teachers’ perception of virtual learning in early childhood education is the key concept. The perception is influenced by challenges. The intention and ability to overcome the challenges determine academic success in early childhood learning. The challenges also influence the struggles that teachers go through to engage early childhood learners in virtual learning. The purpose of the study is to look the teacher’s perception of virtual learning in early childhood setting in the presence of the challenges. This study will utilize a qualitative method because it seeks to determine perception, challenges, and success of virtual learning in early childhood education.
Rubric Standard #4 | Grounded >Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic? For most fields, grounding involves articulating the problem within the context of a theoretical or conceptual framework.

 

 

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses (if applicable)*(Click on this title to be linked to more information)

List the question(s) that you plan to use to address your applied education problem. Your question(s) must be able to address the problem, align with your purposestatement, and be appropriate for the study approach. For a quantitative study, also note the corresponding hypotheses (null and alternative). To ensure alignment, the research question(s) should be worded like the purpose statement.

What are teacher perceptions about the challenges of implementing virtual learning with pre-k students ?

 

 

What are teachers’ perceptions of virtual learning on academic success in a pre-k setting?

 

What challenges do teachers experience when using virtual learning with pre-k students?

 

Rubric Standard #8 | Aligned >Do the various aspects of the research plan align? To ensure a solid foundation is built at the prospectus stage, alignment is needed among all study elements including the problem and purpose statements, evidence, framework, research questions, and methodology.

 

 

Research Methodology and Design*(Click on this title to be linked to more information)

The literature presented in the current study is that which explores the concepts on the topic of the study. The literature does not convey a particular stance on a particular theory or theoretical framework, rather it covers the concepts that interact to form the research problem, questions, and purpose. This, therefore, calls for the use of qualitative design in the research method. A qualitative design as espoused by Yegidis et al. (2018) is applied when a study seeks to help the target readers or users understand experiences, thoughts, or concepts. The current study seeks to look at the perception of teachers of teachers on virtual learning and academic success in early childhood education. The current study seeks to look at the challenges at teachers experience when using virtual learning in early childhood setting, and the struggles teacher undergo through during virtual learning. Another reason that justifies the use of qualitative method is that the study does not have a hypothesis which guides the research process to the final results. Yegidis et al. (2018) states the hypothesis and theory in qualitative study is formulated at the end of the research process and not at the beginning of the research process as seen in the case of quantitative study (Yegidis et al., 2018).

 

References

 

Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2018). Research methods for social             workers (8th ed.). Pearson.

 

 

 

For your planned research design, discuss the type of data you intend to collect and how you plan to collect the data (i.e. secondary databases such IPEDs, self-designed interview protocol, online survey initially published by Pearson, interviews of teachers, etc.…). Briefly summarize the setting of your data collection, such as “planning semistructured interviews with approximately 10 to 12 fourth grade teachers from three school districts that have a total of 103 fourth grade teachers”.

 

            The study will be limited by the sample size, and this is because the respondents will be collected from 8 centers. While there is need to expand the sample size from 120 early childhood educators to a much bigger number, this may not be feasible because of the logistic challenges that are anticipated when moving around the district from one early childhood center to another. The other issue is that some respondents might decline to have their verbal reports recorded.
What limitations, challenges, and/or barriersmight you need to address while conducting this study (e.g., access to participants, access to data, requirements for storing data, your role at the research site or other ethical / IRB considerations, permission to use the instrument, instrumentation fees, etc.)?Please click here* to review the most common IRB issues and how to schedule an appointment with an IRB member to discuss any concerns.If one of the barriers is to collect the data, then reconsider this study idea. Without data, you have no study. You cannot complete your program without a study.

 

            The significance of this study is that it will highlight the challenges that early childhood educators encounter when using virtual learning in early childhood education. It will also reveal the perceptions of early childhood educators on virtual learning and how the perceptions affect the success of virtual learning in early childhood setting.
Rubric Standard #7 | Feasible >Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem? The tentative methodology demonstrates that the researcher has considered the options for inquiry, selected an approach that has the potential to address the problem, and considered risks and burdens placed on research participants.

 

 

Significance*(Click on this title to be linked to more information)

How does your study have the potential to make an original contribution toward addressing a gap in practiceand to positive social change?

 
Rubric Standard #6 | Impact>Does this study have the potential to affect positive social change? As documented in the Significance section, the anticipated findings and project, if applicable, should have the potential to support the mission of Walden University to promote positive social change.  

Rubric Standard #9| Objective >Is the topic approached in an objective manner? The framing of the problem should not reveal bias or present foregone conclusions.

 

 

Partner Site Masking Self-Check*

Walden capstones typically mask the identity of the partner organization.  The methodological and ethical reasons for this practice as well as criteria for exceptions are outlined here(link to posted guidance).

☐Check here to confirm that you will mask the identity of the organization in the final capstone that you publish in ProQuest.

☐ Check here if you perceive that your partner organization’s identity would be impossible to mask or if there is a strong rationale for naming the organization in your capstone, please check this box so that your Program Director can review your request for an exception.

 

 

 

End of Form

Use the rubric below to check your work and the appendix to assist if questions arise.

 

 

Rubric

 

Student Self-Check:Revisions are part of the doctoral process butchecking to ensure all requirements have been met can reduce the need for multiple revisions. Please review the rubric requirements in its entiretyand check to ensure all have been fully met in your prospectus. If anything needs to be strengthened,make those revisions prior to submitting to Taskstream/MYDR for formal review.

Rubric Standard #1 | Complete >Does the research plan contain all the required elements? 

 

Rubric Standard #2| Meaningful >Has a meaningful problem related to practice been identified in the research literature, and local site if applicable? Addressing the stated problem should be the logical next step, building on what is already known, and staying within the student’s area of professional practice.

 

Rubric Standard #3 | Justified>Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field, and local site if applicable? The prospectus should provide relevant statistics and evidenceand other scholarly facts that point to the significance and urgency of the problem.

 

Rubric Standard #4 | Grounded >Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic? For most fields, grounding involves articulating the problem within the context of a theoretical or conceptual framework.

 

Rubric Standard #5 | Original >Does this capstone have the potential to make an original contribution? Addressing the problem should result in an original contribution to the field and/or local site.

 

Rubric Standard #6 | Impact >Does this study have the potential to affect positive social change? As documented in the Significance section, the anticipated findings and project, if applicable, should have the potential to support the mission of Walden University to promote positive social change.

 

Rubric Standard #7 | Feasible >Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem? The tentative methodology demonstrates that the researcher has considered the options for inquiry, selected an approach that has the potential to address the problem, and considered risks and burdens placed on research participants.

 

Rubric Standard #8 | Aligned >Do the various aspects of the research plan align? To ensure a solid foundation is built at the prospectus stage, alignment is needed among all study elements including the problem and purpose statements, evidence, framework, research questions, and methodology.

 

Rubric Standard #9| Objective >Is the topic approached in an objective manner? The framing of the problem should not reveal bias or present foregone conclusions.

 

 

 

Appendix

 

The EDD Doctoral Prospectus Form

The EDD Doctoral Prospectus Formis a brief document that provides preliminary information about your capstone research and is used as the plan for developing the proposal and is evaluated to ensure doctoral-level work (see rubric items above).

 

Prospectus Form approval from the committee chair, second committee member, and a ResearchDirectordesignee is required for you to move forward and work on your proposal. Please note the process is iterative so it is not uncommon for committee members to request revisions.

 

Please note that this form and the appendix materialsare to be used for students who are pursuing an EDD and will be conducting an EdD project study or an EdD dissertation*. The EDD is an applied degree so any study (project study or dissertation) should focus on a gap in practice. A PhD study can focus on a gap in the literature (i.e. something is not known),but for an EDD study the gap must be about practice specifically. The focus should be on a gap between what is currently happening and what stakeholderswould want to happen. Therefore, do not write a problem statement stating “it is not known” or “there is a gap in the literature”.

 

For an EDD project study, the gap in practice is found within the local setting / research site. For this study type, evidence needs to be presented that the local setting currently has a relevant educational problem related to its practice and it needs to be solved. The researcher also needs to show this is a meaningful topic within their field/program specialization literature.

 

For an EDD dissertation, the gap in practice is found within the field/program specialization literature and these studies usually take two common forms. The first type is when the gap in practice is found within the literature and a local setting is used to examine this larger problem, usually as an example of the problem or an exemplar for best practices, i.e. the local setting exhibits best practices that can help to solve the larger problem. If a local setting is used to collect data for an EDD dissertation, the researcher will need to demonstrate the justification for choosing the local setting. The second type of EDD dissertation does not use a local setting to collect data. There is a gap in the literature about practice. In this case, the data may come from a state or national secondary database or teachers who may work across states but share some common experiences such that they can aid in solving the larger problem. In these cases, the researcher does not need to provide evidence or justification of a local problem as there is no local setting that willusedfor thestudy. Evidence will come from the literature in the field/program specialization.

 

 

Title

Agood title*will be concise (aim for 15 words or fewer), signal the direction of the paper, and include the main variables or concepts of the study. The title is not a question and no colons. Below are a few examples. Consider reviewing studies from Walden students who have successfully completed their research*. Note that words with four or more letters are capitalized.

 

Quantitative (QN) Example

Examiningthe Relationship Between Online Doctoral Students’ Use of Institutional Resources and Time to Degree Completion

Note:

  • The word “relationship” indicates a quantitative study.
  • The dependent variable is “time to degree completion” and needs to stay exactly the same throughout the document.

 

Qualitative (QL) Example

Online Doctoral Students’ PerceptionsofResearch Mentoring Resources to Assist with Degree Completion

Note:

  • The word “perceptions” indicates a qualitative study.
  • The main concept is “research mentoring resources” and needs to stay exactly the same throughout the document.

 

 

Supporting Literature

Probably themost important step in the research process issearchingrecent, peer-reviewed literature*and reading articlesrelated to the general area you want to investigate.Identified research problems must be informed by the current research. This requires that you to read, synthesize, and evaluate many articles.  As you read and learn, you will narrow your focus. This is how you will identify a discipline-specific research problem.You will want to focus on reading literature that is scholarly, empirical*and from peer-review sources* that are research related. Click here for additional tips*.

 

As you read and evaluate literature, you also need to organize your research. A literature review matrixis one way to help you visualize what has and hasn’t been done in your field. It will help you understand the scholarly works related to your area of interest. The importance of organizing and recording your review of literature cannot be overstated. You will refer to your notes as you write, so start on the right track from the beginning!

[Suggestion: If you keep your search log in an Excel workbook, use the second tab in the same workbook for your literature review matrix.]

 

For this prospectus form,includethecompleteAPAreference entry and (a) an in-text citation; (b) what they studied; (c) what they found; and (d) why this is important in relation to your study. This evidence provides the justification for your research problemandshows this problem is meaningful to the field / program specialization. These references should primarily be from the past 5years. Reference entries related to the framework should be included here, too. During proposal development, you will conduct an exhaustive* review and synthesize* your sources, rather than summarize.

 

 

Example

Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2013). “It’s complicated” relationship: Research students’ perspective on doctoral supervision. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 165–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.078

 

(a)Ismail et. al (2013);(b)focused on the student experience with supervision while learning to conduct research; (c) found three issues of lack of positive communication, lack of expertise, and power conflicts; and (d) this is important in relation to my study because it may help explain critical elements needed for doctoral degree completion and reflect best practices for institutional supports.

 

As you work on your literature review and move to the proposal stage you will expand your search. Consider how you will determine your search terms or keywordsand the databases you should search.Clickhere for a number of resources to work you through this process*. As you conduct your search of the literature, stay organized by keeping a search log*.

 

Search Log Example
Database Search Terms Results Notes
Education Source online doctoral program completion; limited to peer reviewed, 2016-present 1175 Search too broad; Narrow by using multiple terms
ERIC online doctoral program completion AND ABD; limited to peer reviewed, 2016-present 13 Much better; Several relevant articles found
Next Education Source Etc.    

 

As you read and evaluate literature*, you also need to organize your research. A literature review matrix*is one way to help you visualize what has and has not been done in your field.It will help you understand the scholarly works related to your area of interest.The importance of organizing and recording your review of literature cannot be overstated. You will refer to your notes as you write, so start on the right track from the beginning with your prospectus!

[Suggestion: If you keep your search log in an Excel workbook, use the second tab in the same workbook for your literature review matrix.]

 

Rubric Standard #3 | Justified>Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field, and local site if applicable? The prospectus should provide relevant statistics and evidence and other scholarly facts that point to the significance and urgency of the problem. 

 

 

 

Research Problem

For both the EDD dissertation and the EDD project study, the problem must be about a gap in practice as the EDD is an applied degree. A gap in practice is the difference between what is currently happening and what stakeholders would want to happen to achieve best practices. For an EDD Dissertation the gap in practice will be found within the research literature. If the EDD Dissertation collects data in a specific localized setting, evidence is needed to justify the use of the local setting. For a Project Study, the gap in practice is found within a local settingbutitis also required to show that the problem is relevant and meaningful to the research literature found within the field/program specialization.

 

The EdD dissertation explores a gap in the literature about practice. There is something not known about practice, something we donot know how to practice, or it is not known if the practice is effective etc.The need to address an identified gap in practicemust be clear, current, and relevant to the discipline and area of practice.

 

A research problem* is a focused topic of concern, a condition to be improved upon, or troubling question that is supported in scholarly literature or theory that you study to understand in more detail, and that can lead to recommendations for resolutions. It is the research problem* that drives the rest of the study: the purpose, the research questions, and the methodology. Click here* for additional resources. Keep the problem statement to one sentence.

 

Example (EDD Dissertation)

The problem to be addressed through this study is thatnationallyonline doctoral students’time to degree completion has increased over the last decade despite a federal initiative to fund colleges and universities’ efforts to provide additional resources.

 

Example (EDD Project Study)

The problem to be addressed through this study is that 60% of online doctoral students do not use the new research mentoring resources to assist with degree completion at Innovative College (IC, a pseudonym).

 

Rubric Standard #2| Meaningful >Has a meaningful problem related to practice been identified in the research literature, and local site if applicable? Addressing the stated problem should be the logical next step, building on what is already known, and staying within the student’s area of professional practice.

Rubric Standard #3 | Justified>Is evidence presented that this problem is significant to the discipline and/or professional field, and local site if applicable? The prospectus should provide relevant statistics and evidence and other scholarly facts that point to the significance and urgency of the problem. 

Rubric Standard #5 | Original >Does this capstone have the potential to make an original contribution? Addressing the problem should result in an original contribution to the field and/or local site.

Rubric Standard #9| Objective >Is the topic approached in an objective manner? The framing of the problem should not reveal bias or present foregone conclusions. 

 

 

 

Purpose

To address your stated research problem, what is the purpose of your study? Will you describe, compare, explore, examine, etc.? Be sure to clarify your variables/concepts of interest.

  • In quantitative studies, state what needs be studied by describing two or more factors (variables) and the conjectured association (i.e. comparative or relational) that will be used to address the study problem.
  • In qualitative studies, describe the need for increased understanding about the issue to be studied, based on the identified gap orproblem.

Your purpose statement should reflect and align* to your problem statement. Again, keep the purpose statement to one sentence to ensure it is focused and concise.

 

QNExample (EDD Dissertation)

The purpose of this quantitative study isto investigate the difference intime to degree completion between students who attended colleges that received federal funding for additional resources and students who attended colleges that did not receive the funding.

 

QL Example (EDD Project Study)

The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore IC graduate students’ perceptions of theirsuccesses, challenges, and suggested improvements for the new research mentoring resources.

 

Rubric Standard #8 | Aligned >Do the various aspects of the research plan align? To ensure a solid foundation is built at the prospectus stage, alignment is needed among all study elements including the problem and purpose statements, evidence, framework, research questions, and methodology.

 

 

 

 

Framework

The framework includes the theory(ies) and/or concept(s)*relevant to your topic. Align the framework with the problem, purpose, research questions, and background literature of your study. A conceptual framework grounds a qualitative study and a theoretical framework grounds a quantitative study.  The theoretical or conceptual framework is the basis for understanding, designing, and analyzing ways to investigate your research problem. Provide the original scholarly literature (citing original authors) on the theory and/or concepts, even if it is more than 5 years old. Do not cite secondary sources.

 

Example Theoretical Framework

The theory(ies) and/or concept(s) that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development.

 

Example Conceptual Framework

The theory(ies) and/or concept(s) that ground this study include Perry’s (1970) theory of epistemological development, focusing specifically on the concepts of online learning and the pedagogical challenges associated with online learning and dissertation writing.

 

Next, explain how these theories and/or concepts relate to your research problem, purpose, and methodological decisions. Your topic/approach should align with the identified framework so that you will either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic.

 

ExampleConnection for the Theoretical Framework

The logical connections between the framework presented and my study approach include Perry’s theoretical work, which has been used extensively in all aspects of higher education, albeit more frequently with undergraduates than with doctoral students. Perry (1970) identified funding as a key construct underlying the theory.

 

Example Connection for the Conceptual Framework

The logical connections between the framework presented and my study approach include Perry’s theoretical work, which has been used extensively in all aspects of higher education, albeit more frequently with undergraduates than with doctoral students. Further, subsequent research and application of Perry’s theory offer guidanceon ways to facilitate academic development, thus allowing for insight into the pedagogical challenge of degree completion.

 

Here is the Grounding Check – make sure you can answer “yes” to all these questions:

  • Does your framework operationalize your topic?
  • Does your framework guide the organization of the lit review?
  • Does your framework align with your design?
  • Do your RQs build from your framework?
  • Does your framework guide your data collection and analysis?

Rubric Standard #4 | Grounded >Is the problem framed to enable the researcher to either build upon or counter the previously published findings on the topic? For most fields, grounding involves articulating the problem within the context of a theoretical or conceptual framework.

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses (if applicable)

List the research question(s)*that are informed by the study purpose and will be used to address the research problem. A research question*provides a foundation for the approach and design.

 

QN Example (EDD Dissertation)

RQ:What is the difference intime to degree completion between students who attended colleges that received federal funding for additional resources and students who attended colleges that did not receive the funding?

 

H0: There is no statistically significant difference intime to degree completion between students who attended colleges that received federal funding for additional resources and students who attended colleges that did not receive the funding.

HA: There is a statistically significant difference in difference intime to degree completion between students who attended colleges that received federal funding for additional resources and students who attended colleges that did not receive the funding.

 

QL Example (EDD Project Study)

RQ1: What are IC graduate students’ perceptions of their successes using the new research mentoring resources?

RQ2: What are IC graduate students’ perceptions of their challenges using the new research mentoring resources?

RQ3: What areICgraduate students’ suggestions on improving the new research mentoring resources?

 

Rubric Standard #8 | Aligned >Do the various aspects of the research plan align? To ensure a solid foundation is built at the prospectus stage, alignment is needed among all study elements including the problem and purpose statements, evidence, framework, research questions, and methodology.

 

 

Research Methodology and Design

Explain the systematic approach and research design you will use to address your research question(s). Examples of commondesigns are as follows:

  • Quantitative—correlational;causal-comparative;survey research designs using validated existing survey instruments;or other quantitativedesigns
  • Qualitative—basic (generic) qualitativedesigns;casestudies;or other qualitative designs

 

QN Example (EDD Dissertation)

To address the research question, I will use acausal comparativedesignto compare time to degree completion between students who attended colleges that received federal funding for additional resources and students who attended colleges that did not receive the funding. I will retrieve secondary data and conduct a t test.

 

QL Example (EDD Project Study)

To address the research questions in this qualitative study, I will use a basic qualitative design(Patton, 2015) using semistructuredinterviews with approximately 10 to 12 online doctoral studentsfromIC.

 

Note that the above examples already include the possibledata collection sources. At this point, you should have an idea of the type of data and the number of data sets needed to address your research question(s). Explain whether you will be collecting primary data (collected by you, the researcher) or accessing secondary data (preexisting or public data collected by others). Please be aware that doctoral students often experience 10% response rates, meaning that you need to design your study in a way that you can ask 100 online doctoral students in the hope that 10 volunteer. In quantitative studies, you need even more data to conduct inferential statistics. https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/316155

 

If you are collecting data, you should present the source of the instrument(s) and source and number of potential participants. If using secondary data, identify the data source and how the data will be accessed. Possiblesecondary data sources*, by program, are available on the Center for Research Quality website. [Note. This is your tentative plan, so keep in mind that things might need to be modified during the proposal stage—particularly after you have completed your exhaustive review of the literature.]

 

QN Example (EDD Dissertation)

For my planned research design, I will access a list of colleges and universities that received federal funding using the NCES databases. I will use the same NCES database to develop a comparison group of colleges and universities that did not receive funding. As the funding started in 2013, I will access the time to degree completion of these institutions using the IPEDS database from the year 2014 to the most recent year available.

Independent Variable: Students attend institutions with federal funding – yes/no

Dependent Variable: Time to Degree Completion

Analysis: t test

Data Needed: 64 per group

 

QL Example (EDD Project Study)

For my planned research design, I will need to recruit online doctoral students for individual interviews at IC. A self-designed interview protocol will be developed to address the problem and purpose of the study.I will attend the Office Hours – Research Ethics – Academic Guides at Walden University to learn about the procedures to contact IC and possible incentives I can offer for participants, such as a $25 gift card. My initial goal will be to recruit10 participants but increase this number if data saturation is not yet achieved (Fusch & Ness, 2015).

 

Finally, provide information on limitations, challenges, and/or barriers that may need to be addressed when conducting this study. These may include access to participants, access to data, separation of roles (researcher versus employee), instrumentation fees, etc.If you are thinking about collecting data at your place of work,are in a supervisory position, or on a sensitive topic, or from a vulnerable population,an early consultation with the Institutional Review Board (IRB; [email protected]) during your prospectus process is recommended to gain ethics guidance that you can incorporate into your subsequent proposal drafts and research planning. [Note. Find more information on research ethics and potential “red flag” issues in the  IRB Guides and FAQs. *]

 

QN Example

A potential barrier when using secondary data provided by various colleges and universities is that institutions may vary in how they report their data, causing issues when comparing data across institutions. It will be important to examine the IPEDS codebook to ensure any anomalies are identified and addressed.

 

QL Example

A potential barrier when collecting primary data that includes interviews is that it may be difficult to recruit enough online doctoral students at IC to meet saturation. This may be particularly difficult given these are online doctoral students so may be very busy and hard to reach electronically. It would be useful to attend one of the CRQ webinars* on how to increase research participation.

Rubric Standard #7 | Feasible >Can a systematic method of inquiry be used to address the problem? The tentative methodology demonstrates that the researcher has considered the options for inquiry, selected an approach that has the potential to address the problem, and considered risks and burdens placed on research participants.   

 

Significance

Explain how your study addresses the meaningful, discipline-specific problem related to a gap in practice (project study)/gap in research about practice (dissertation) that you identified and will,therefore,make an original contribution to your field, and to positive social change.

 

Example

This study is significant becauseit will fill a gap in practice in that educational leaders will have a better understanding of how well the newresources work in meeting the initial goals. Educational leaders will better understand the value of these resources with respect to their initial goals and gain new insight to better meet the needs of online doctoral students. Because a broad range of doctoral students attend online, supporting their successful attainment of a terminal degree allows for increased diversity among individuals in key academic and scholarly leadership positions.

 

Rubric Standard #6 | Impact >Does this study have the potential to affect positive social change? As documented in the Significance section, the anticipated findings and project, if applicable, should have the potential to support the mission of Walden University to promote positive social change.

Rubric Standard #9| Objective >Is the topic approached in an objective manner? The framing of the problem should not reveal bias or present foregone conclusions.

 

Please note that right hand margin comment boxes with an arrow in the bottom right-hand corner need to be expanded to see the entire feedback.

 

Greetings! Your committee will be reviewing your document and will be adding comments in balloons like this. The capstone process is iterative, and all comments are meant to help you improve your study and ensure you meet minimum standards as you move forward.

 

This paragraph is not necessary for this form.  You can save this paragraph for the proposal.

 

Get rid of the opposing view.  You may have ONLY ONE framework theory.

 

This sentence makes no sense.  Try to make your statements concise.  This type of writing should not be wordy or flowery.

 

This sentence does not speak about your design approach,

 

You do not indicate how you will conduct your particular study.  Will you conduct interviews? If so, 120 people is too many.  I suggest you contact the writing center and look at some examples from other students.

 

You are going to record interviews with 120 people?  That will take years.

 

Please complete

Portfolio

TCHR2002 Children, Families & communities

ASSESSMENT 2: Portfolio

 

Summary

Title Assessment 2: Portfolio of short responses
Due Date Friday 11th August (WEEK 6) at 11:59pm AEDT
Length 1500 words including references
Weighting 50%
Submission 1 word document submitted to Turn it in
Unit Learning Outcomes You will demonstrate the following Unit Learning Outcomes on the successful completion of this task:

 

·         ULO1: compare and critique historical and contemporary constructions of childhood and families, including those pertaining to Indigenous childhoods.

·         ULO2: identify the ways to ensure children feel that they are belonging, being, and becoming.

·         ULO3: explain the diverse range of issues affecting children, families and communities including social, economic and educational policies and their impact upon service provision for children and families.

·         ULO4: Critically analyse texts, images, and songs in terms of the construction of childhood, and families across diverse contexts.

 

 

 

Task Description

This task requires students to reflect upon key issues presented in the unit content and complete three (3) x 500 word responses to the questions under Task Instructions.

 

Rationale

Working with and supporting children and families within the context of their community can present challenges. Early childhood professionals should reflect on the diversity of issues that face children and families.  The aim of this assessment task is for students to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding regarding contemporary and diverse issues facing children, families and communities.

 

Task Instructions

You are required to answer each of the following three questions in approximately 500 words. All responses must be literature supported.

 

Question 1

 

The internet provides new opportunities for social connection for people who are isolated. With reference to the Unit materials provide responses to the following statements.

 

Part A:

Find an example of a website that enables isolated families from different socio-cultural backgrounds to make social connections that will assist them with their parenting. Write a short statement about the website.

 

 

Part B:

Do you believe the social connectedness achieved through the internet bring the same benefits to families as face-to-face social connections? Why or why not?

 

 

Question 2

With reference to the Unit materials provide responses to the following statements.

 

Part A: Why is it difficult to provide a clear definition of abuse and neglect?

Part B: To what extent do you think that child protection is a community responsibility?

Part C: What do you think are the barriers to community responsibility in this area?

 

 

Question 3

With reference to the Unit materials provide responses to the following statements.

 

Part A: Investigate an Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) service or organisation of your choice and review the extent to which parents have a role in governance and opportunities to influence design and implementation of the setting.

 

You are encouraged to use a range of strategies to gather information about your chosen setting such as;reviewing the ECEC website and social media pages, searching ACECQA service ratings https://www.acecqa.gov.au/resources/national-registers/services.  You might also like to telephone your chosen setting to ask questions relevant to the assessment task.

 

Part B: In what ways could your chosen service improve their partnerships with families?

 

Follow the steps below to complete this task:

 

  • Create a new Word Document and save it with your surname and initial and the assessment task’s name. E.g: MillsA_assessment2_portfolio
  • Create a cover page with the following details:
    • Student name
    • Student ID
    • Unit code
    • Unit Assessor and Tutor names
    • Date submitted
  • Complete three (3) x 500 word responses to the prompts listed above. Responses must be literature supported.
  • Complete one reference list for the entire assessment task.
  • Once complete, submit task via the Turn it in link in the Assessment and Submission section of the unit site.
  • Adhere to APA7 formatting guidelines

 

Referencing Style

APA 7th referencing format is required in Faculty of Education assessment tasks – link to SCU Lib guide here:   APA 7 Referencing.

 

Task Submission

Assessments should be submitted using the Turn it in activity titled “Assessment 2: Portfolio” in the Assessments Tasks & Submission section on the Blackboard TCHR2002 site. Only Microsoft Word documents submitted via the Turn it in portal on Blackboard will be accepted. You must label your submission with your surname and initials and the assessment task’s name, e.g: MillsA_assessment2_portfolio

 

Special Consideration

Students wishing to request special consideration to extend the due date of an assessment task must submit a Request for Special Consideration form via their My Enrolment page as early as possible and prior to the original due date for that assessment task, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.

Late Submissions & Penalties

Except when special consideration is awarded, late submission of assessment tasks will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be incurred as soon as the deadline is reached.

  • a penalty of 5% of the available marks will be deducted from the actual mark at one minute after the time listed in the due date
  • a further penalty of 5% of the available mark will be deducted from the actual mark achieved on each subsequent calendar day until the mark reaches zero.”

 

Grades & Feedback

Assignments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade and written feedback. Grades and feedback will be posted to “Grades & Feedback” section on the Blackboard unit site. Please allow 7 working days for marks to be posted.

 

Academic Integrity

At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty, fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility and respect in relation to academic work.The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more information see the SCU Academic Integrity Framework

 

Generative Artificial Intelligence tools

I am reminding you that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools are NOT permitted for use in this assessment (see Assessment Information Booklet, Section 8.0). Using any such tools constitutes academic misconduct, as you are not the author/creator of the assessment you are submitting. Future pedia is a good starting point for checking to make sure the tool/app that you want to use is not GenAI driven; however, remember that new artificial intelligence tools are coming online daily, so take a screenshot.

As a student in the contemporary world, I am going to suggest to you that you should take steps to safeguard yourself from academic misconduct by making sure that you keep records of your processes when completing your assessment – e.g., screenshots (with date and time evident), log of search history, different versions of files etc. You don’t have to do this; it’s just a suggestion. Another suggestion is to use a free GenAI checker (see if you agree with their T&Cs first) to make sure it flags your submission as ‘written by a human’.

 

Assessment Rubric

 

Marking criteria and % allocation High Distinction

(85-100%)

Distinction

(75-84%)

Credit

(65-74%)

Pass

(50-64%)

Fail

(0-49%)

Criteria 1

Identifies a suitable website for isolated families and explains how the website helps families establish social connections. Provides a professional perspective on the benefits of internet-based social connectedness compared to face-to-face interactions for families, as well as reasons for each perspective.

/15

Identifies a suitable website and thoroughly describes its features and benefits. Provides a well-reasoned professional perspective on internet-based social connectedness versus face-to-face interactions and their advantages and disadvantages for families. Each viewpoint is supported by current academic literature. Identifies a suitable website and provides a clear and concise description of its features and benefits. Provides an insightful professional perspective on internet-based social connectedness versus face-to-face interactions and their advantages and disadvantages for families. Each viewpoint is supported by current academic literature.

 

Identifies a suitable website and provides a description of its features and benefits. Provides a sound professional perspective on internet-based social connectedness versus face-to-face interactions and their advantages and disadvantages for families. Some current academic literature is used to support each viewpoint. Identifies an appropriate website and provides a general description of its features and benefits.  Provides a satisfactory professional perspective on internet-based social connectedness versus face-to-face interactions and their advantages and disadvantages for families. Minimal current academic literature is used to support each viewpoint.

 

Does not identify an appropriate website or an adequate description of its features and benefits. Does not provide an adequate professional perspective on the social connectedness achieved through internet-based interactions versus face-to-face interactions, and the advantages and disadvantages for families.
Criteria 2

With reference to the unit materials explain why defining abuse and neglect is difficult and specifies the extent to which child protection can be regarded as a community responsibility.

Identify and describe potential barriers to community child protection responsibility.

/15

 

Provides an insightful and well-articulated explanation of the difficulties that arise in defining abuse and neglect and uses a variety of relevant examples to support their discussion. Provides a comprehensive justification for considering child protection as a community responsibility and exhibits a deep understanding of the potential barriers to community responsibility for child protection.

 

Provides a thorough explanation of the difficulties that arise in defining abuse and neglect and uses relevant examples to support the discussion.

Provides a solid justification for considering child protection as a community responsibility and exhibits a comprehensive understanding of the potential barriers to community responsibility for child protection.

Provides a sound explanation of the difficulties that arise in defining abuse and neglect and uses some examples to support the discussion. Provides a sound justification for considering child protection as a community responsibility and exhibits a sound understanding of some of the potential barriers to community responsibility for child protection. Provides a general explanation of the difficulties that arise in defining abuse and neglect and uses few examples to support the discussion. Provides a satisfactory justification for considering child protections as a community responsibility and exhibits a satisfactory understanding of the potential barriers to community responsibility for child protection.

 

Does not provide an adequate explanation of the difficulties that arise in defining abuse and neglect. Does not provide a justification for considering child protection as a community responsibility.

Does not identify or describe potential barriers to community responsibility for child protection.

 

Criteria 3

Selects an appropriate Early Childhood Education and Care service. With reference to the Unit materials examines the extent to which parents and children participate in governance and their opportunities to influence design and implementation; and identifies ways in which the service can improve its partnership with families.

/15

Provides well-articulated evidence of the extent to which parents and children are involved in the governance of their chosen ECEC service.

Demonstrates an in-depth understanding of how parents and children can contribute to the ECEC service. Provides insightful suggestions for how the service can improve its partnership with families supported by academic literature.

Provides solid evidence of the extent to which parents and children are involved in the governance of their chosen ECEC service.

Demonstrates a good understanding of how parents and children can contribute to the ECEC service. Provides clear suggestions for how the service could improve its partnership with families supported by academic literature.

Provides sound evidence of the extent to which parents are involved in the governance of their chosen ECEC service. Demonstrates an appropriate understanding of how parents and children can contribute to the ECEC service. Provides suggestions for how the service could improve its partnership with families with some reference to academic literature.

 

Provides satisfactory evidence of the extent to which parents are involved in the governance of their chosen ECEC service. Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of how parents and children to the design and implementation of the ECEC service. Provides suggestions for how the service could improve its partnership with families with little or no reference to academic literature.

 

Fails to provide evidence of the degree to which parents are involved in the governance of their chosen ECEC service.  Lacks an understanding of how parents and children can contribute to the design and implementation of the ECEC service.
Criteria 4

Academic Literacy including correct word count, correct writing conventions, use of professional language and academic referencing (APA 7th style) and a minimum of 10 academic references.

/5

Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of correct writing conventions, including accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. The reference list contains all the required information in the correct APA 7 format. Demonstrates a thorough understanding of correct writing conventions by correctly using spelling, grammar, and punctuation throughout with very minor inaccuracies.

The reference list contains all the required information in the correct APA 7 format, with very minor errors.

Demonstrates a good understanding of correct writing conventions by correctly using spelling, grammar, and punctuation, with minor inaccuracies.

The reference list contains all the required information, but some items may be in an incorrect format or have more than five minor errors.

 

Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of correct writing conventions by mostly using correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation, with some inaccuracies.

The reference list provides most of the required information, but there are some errors.

Poor understanding of correct writing conventions, including accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. The reference list is incorrectly formatted or there are an inadequate number of references.

 

 

Description of SCU Grades

 

High Distinction:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Distinction:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Credit:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts. The student’s performance could be described as competent in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Pass:

The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area. The student’s performance could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Fail:

The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.

 

Resource

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ELSE 6043 ~ Strategies for Teaching Exceptional Learners in the Content Areas

 

Module 5: Strategies Resource Booklet Assignment

 

Throughout this course, you will read about, research, and apply strategies for teaching students with exceptionalities in the content areas.  For your final project assignment, you will create a Strategies Resource Booklet that you will be able to use to further develop your teaching skills and your students’ learning to meet their academic needs.  This resource booklet will include different strategies for classroom management and strategies for teaching academic content.

 

You will use the template that is provided to include the name of each strategy; a description of each strategy supported by research/in-text citations; a picture of each strategy; and three websites that you can use to research the strategy more and to support you and your students.  The resource booklet will include the following:

 

  • Three (3) classroom management strategies;
  • Three (3) technology strategies;
  • Three (3) questioning strategies;
  • Three (3) direct instruction strategies;
  • Three (3) indirect instruction strategies;
  • Three (3) cognitive strategies;
  • Three (3) cooperative learning strategies.
  • Three (3) strategies that you select

 

Use the template that is provided to complete this assignment.

 

 

 

 

 

  Exemplary Acceptable Unacceptable
Classroom Management Strategies 21-25 points

All four of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 classroom management strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

16-20 points

Three of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 classroom management strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

0-15 points

Two or fewer of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 classroom management strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

Technology Strategies 21-25 points

All four of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 technology strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

16-20 points

Three of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 technology strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

0-15 points

Two or fewer of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 technology strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

Questioning Strategies 21-25 points

All four of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 questioning strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

16-20 points

Three of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 questioning strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

0-15 points

Two or fewer of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 questioning strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

Direct Instruction Strategies 21-25 points

All four of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 direct instruction strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

16-20 points

Three of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 direct instruction strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

0-15 points

Two or fewer of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 direct instruction strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

Indirect Instruction Strategies 21-25 points

All four of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 indirect instruction strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

16-20 points

Three of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 indirect instruction strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

0-15 points

Two or fewer of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 indirect instruction strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

Cognitive Strategies 21-25 points

All four of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 cognitive strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

16-20 points

Three of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 cognitive strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

0-15 points

Two or fewer of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 cognitive strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

Cooperative Learning Strategies 21-25 points

All four of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 cooperative learning strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

16-20 points

Three of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 cooperative learning strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

0-15 points

Two or fewer of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 cooperative learning strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

Your Choice Strategies 21-25 points

All four of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 choice strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

16-20 points

Three of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 choice strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

0-15 points

Two or fewer of the criteria were met: (1) Included 3 choice strategies; (2) Included descriptions with citations for each strategy; (3) Included a picture/illustration for each strategy; (4) Included three websites for each strategy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annotated Collection Of The University’s Academic Support Resources

For ADE or DSE: choose ADE: see the information below:

 

EdD Students

The Doctor of Education (EdD) is completed using the Applied Dissertation Experience (ADE). Per the ADE handbook (2020).

The applied doctoral project or dissertation-in-practice is a substantial, scholarly work conducted independently by a candidate under the guidance of faculty members comprising the candidate’s Doctoral Committee. Following the approved final manuscript, the candidate will present the findings and contributions to practice to the Doctoral Committee as a professional conference-level presentation or poster, or demonstrate that the manuscript has been accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed, professional journal (p. 3).

Many use the EdD as a way to continue practical, applied work in their field, be it in a PK-12 school system, non-profit organization, or another setting. This “boots on the ground” degree is meant to impact change and growth not only for the doctoral student but their professional environment. The EdD is a 48-54 credit program. The EdD dissertation is split into three sections, a departure from the traditional five-chapter dissertation (found in the PhD program).  The three sections are then further split into two “phases” of document readiness, the Applied Dissertation Proposal (DP) which includes both sections 1 and 2, and the Applied Dissertation Manuscript (DM), which includes sections 1, 2, and 3.  The ADE handbook (2020) notes that the final manuscript is comprised of three Sections:

 

 

You may be inspired to try and complete all of your coursework in the “A” courses – and that’s a GREAT goal. However, the only guarantee in research is that nothing is ever guaranteed. As a professional learner, you may have competing external demands (e.g., work, family) and internal demands (e.g., changes to your study, longer-than-expected data collection/analysis).  It’s important to remember that the B, C, and D sections are not a punishment, but rather an opportunity for you to complete your deliverable(s).

The ADE process is unique, and understanding the deliverables associated with each courses, and the progression of courses is vital to your success.

Remember, there’s a big deliverable at the end of each course – these courses will challenge you in many ways, so making use of the resources that we’ve introduced in this course will do nothing but help you succeed. While your dissertation is written only by you; it takes a monumental, team effort to reach the finish line. The more you are proactive, and the more you reach out for conversation, collaboration, and support, the easier this journey will be! See the attached ADE Manual for support as well.

 

For the Commons area:

 

The Commons serves as a space for students, faculty, and team members to engage with students, connect with faculty, and obtain resources to enhance their learning and teaching experiences. We encourage you to get involved in your school communities. When you joined NU you were automatically added to a few communities.

 

Another great resource that can be found within the GSSC and NCUOne is the Commons, your place to find support and engage with other students across the university. The Commons is an internal community-based platform that enables students and faculty to share resources and support with each other outside of the course room.

 

 

Investigating Academic Resources

To learn more about the variety of academic support options available to you, let’s go to Great Start’s Unit One: NU Resources where you will learn more about the Academic Success Center, Graduate Studies Support Center (GSSC), Library, and Academic and Finance Advising Teams.

Academic Success Center (ASC)

The Academic Success Center (ASC) provides tiers of support to provide you with a variety of resources that can be personalized to support your unique needs. The ASC focuses on writing and statistics resources, including APA and editing resources.

The Academic Success Center objectives are:

  • Provide multimodal and accessible resources to the university community.
  • Collaborate with faculty and staff to provide students with personalized learning experiences.
  • Promote the building of connections (peer, faculty, coach) through academic coaching.
  • Challenge students to become active participants in their academic journey.
  • Promote inclusivity, anti-racism, accessibility, and interdependence.
  • Serve as a model of expertise for personalized online academic support that is known for inspiring student success by offering collaborative and inclusive student-centered assistance.

 

Academic Coaching Sessions are a larger part of the ASC’s services and objectives. These coaching sessions are both synchronous, asynchronous, group, and individual.

Graduate Studies Support Center (GSSC)

The Graduate Studies Support Center (GSSC) is dedicated to ensuring every student’s academic success and providing faculty the necessary tools and resources to excel in teaching. The ultimate goal of the GSSC is the creation of a culture of engagement. To ensure a culture of engagement, the GSSC’s learning objectives are:

  • Provide university-wide leadership, and coordination of activities, aimed at supporting excellence in teaching.
  • Promote engagement, and enhance the student learning experience, by supporting university technology and assisting faculty and other stakeholders in integrating cutting-edge technology.
  • Provide effective, relevant training and resources to all academic units of the university.
  • Nurture a culture of commitment to student success that stimulates dialogue, and fosters a sense of shared purpose across the entire NU (formerly NCU) community.

Library

The Library supports the academic research needs for students, faculty, and staff by providing timely access to quality, scholarly, and appropriate resources and library services. These services include research databases, interlibrary loan service, Ask a Librarian, One-on-One sessions, library workshops, and research consultations.

 

Academic and Finance Team

Your academic and finance advisor (AFA) is a very important piece of your academic journey. Think of this person as a guide on the side who can assist with your questions, concerns, and needs for academic and financial issues.

 

See the attachment for the ADE