Part 3 | Literature Review/Analysis Final

Assignment: Submit the final Literature Review/Analysis Final Paper.

 

Assignment Format:

Actions

  • Length :Minimum four pages PLUS cover page and works cited page (MIN TOTAL 6 PAGES)
  • Include a cover page with your name, topic title
  • Properly cite your in-text sources and provide a works cited page
  • Follow the APA style formatting
  • Follow essay format
  • Double spaced

 

Discussion 6

Answer Each Question in 150 words

 

  1. Summarize the importance of incorporating a client’s identity into the treatment of a substance use disorder.

2.Explain the 2 concepts about cultural competence (Working with people of color & Working with women) that social workers need to keep in mind when working with a client struggling with a substance use disorder.

 

Public Speaking

Week 4 Assignment 2 Template: PowerPoint Topic and Organization

 

Title page

 

  1. Topic: Public speaking
  2. specific purpose:

 

 

 

Thesis Statement (one sentence that incorporates the clear topic and the direction you are going with your points)

 

Main Points (stated in words or phrases)

#1:

#2:

#3:

 

Three Sources (just the titles for this week)

Source 1

Source 2

Source 3

 

Reflection

(Paragraph reflecting on the cross-cultural aspect)

 

 

7-2 Project One: Critical Analysis

7-2 Project One: Critical Analysis Essay

Course Outcomes

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

  • Identify main ideas, supporting evidence, and conclusions through critical analysis for utilizing these components in one’s own writing
  • Integrate appropriate and qualified evidence into one’s own composition through effective research

Overview

The project for this course is the creation of a critical analysis essay. Writing is a craft that allows people to express themselves in various ways. The ability to articulate a message through writing is essential in any career. The writing process can be very intimidating; however, the more you work with it, the more comfortable the process becomes.

You developed a thesis about the information presented in the article you selected, and now, you will support that thesis through a critical analysis essay.

Directions

In this project, you will follow the writing process to revise your critical analysis essay draft from previous assignments. Once your thesis is established, you will use evidence from the reading to support it throughout your essay.

There is no right or wrong thesis—it is how you support your thesis that makes your essay effective. To thoroughly revise the work, be sure to refer to your instructor’s feedback. Finally, proofread your final draft and correct any errors you may find. This assignment will be submitted in Brightspace.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

  1. Introduction: This paragraph is where readers will have a chance to get an idea of what your essay will be about. Do not give all your information away here. Instead, give readers a sample of what is to come and what points you will be supporting with evidence in the essay’s body.
    1. Provide an overview of the work you have analyzed by briefly describing the main points and your thoughts about the writing.
    2. Compose a thesis that you will support with evidence throughout the essay. This statement will give direction to your essay and should be well thought out.
  2. Body: The body is your opportunity to describe and support your thesis in-depth. Ensure that your thoughts and evidence are clear and organized in a way that is easy for readers to follow and understand.
    1. Be sure to write organized paragraphs that clearly state their main idea and move logically from one to the other.
    2. Your body paragraphs should support your thesis by combining thoughts and ideas with evidence. There is no such thing as a right or wrong evaluation; the key is how well your thesis is supported and the quality of the evidence used.
  3. Conclusion: Think of the conclusion as a review of your analysis. Use this section to restate your thesis and remind readers of your supporting evidence. Think of this paragraph as the last chance to prove your point.
    1. Briefly summarize the main points that helped form your analysis. This section should consist of a brief review of your main ideas.
    2. Draw conclusions based on your evidence.
      1. Use evidence that you have found to wrap up the essay in a meaningful way that relates to your audience.

What to Submit

Submit your project as a 3- to 4-page Microsoft Word document (plus a cover page and references) with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use at least three references from your selected reading. Follow APA or MLA citation guidelines when citing sources both throughout and at the end of your paper.

 

Task Is Attached

Lesson: Prewriting: Comparison and Contrast Exam# 355104
Prewriting: Compare and Contrast
Advanced –
score of 100%
The prewriting effectively addresses the purpose of the assignment and the requirements of
the prompt.
x The writer chose one of the assigned topics and submitted an outline or graphic
organizer.
x The writer included all the required introductory information: a topic, background
statement, and thesis statement.
x The thesis statement makes a claim or takes a position on the topic, and the main points
are outlined clearly.
x The writer included at least 3 main points on the topic, with at least three supporting
elements for each. The main points connect clearly to and support the thesis statement
x The writer’s conclusion reinforced the thesis statement.
x The writer arranged the main points in a logical order to suit the claim made in the
thesis statement.
x The supporting elements provided for each main point are relevant and clearly illustrate
the comparison and contrast pattern of development for the chosen topic.
x The paper is mostly free of errors that interfere with a reader’s ability to understand the
content and uses the required font, header, line spacing, and margins.
Proficient score of 85%
The prewriting adequately addresses the purpose of the assignment and the requirements
of the prompt.
x The writer chose one of the assigned topics and submitted an outline or graphic
organizer.
x The writer included most of the required introductory information: a topic, background
statement, and thesis statement.
x The thesis statement makes a claim or takes a position on the topic, but the main points
are not outlined clearly.
x The writer included at least 3 main points on the topic, with at least two or more
supporting elements for each. The main points connect to and support the thesis
statement, however much of the information is obvious.
x The writer’s conclusion mostly reinforced the thesis statement.
x The writer arranged the main points in an order that mostly suits the claim made in the
thesis statement.
x The supporting elements provided for each main point are mostly relevant and
adequately illustrate the comparison and contrast pattern of development for the chosen
topic.
x The paper is reasonably free of errors that interfere with a reader’s ability to understand
the content and uses the required font, header, line spacing, and margins.
Developing score of 70%
The prewriting partially addresses the purpose of the assignment and the requirements of
the prompt.
x The writer chose one of the assigned topics and submitted an outline or graphic
organizer.
Lesson: Prewriting: Comparison and Contrast Exam# 355104
x The writer included some of the required introductory information: a topic, background
statement, and thesis statement, however some of these elements are missing.
x The thesis statement does not make a claim or take a position on the topic and/or the
main points are not outlined.
x The writer included less than 3 main points on the topic and/or lacks three supporting
elements for each. The main points do not completely connect to and support the thesis
statement, and much of the information is obvious and/or needs more development.
x The writer’s conclusion is underdeveloped and/or is beginning to reinforce the thesis
statement.
x The writer arranged the main points in an order that is beginning to suit the claim made
in the thesis statement, but the outline lacks organization.
x The supporting elements provided for each main point lack focus, logical development,
and are beginning to illustrate the comparison and contrast pattern of development for
the chosen topic.
x The paper includes errors that interfere with a reader’s ability to understand the content
and/or does not use the required font, header, line spacing, and margins.
Emerging score of 60%
The prewriting minimally addresses the purpose of the assignment and the requirements of
the prompt.
x The writer chose one of the assigned topics but did not submit an outline or graphic
organizer.
x The writer minimally included some of the required introductory information: a topic,
background statement, and thesis statement, however most of these elements are
missing.
x The thesis statement does not make a claim or take a position on the topic, is not
related to the topic, and/or the main points are not outlined.
x The writer did not include 3 main points on the topic and/or lacks three supporting
elements for each. The main points do not connect to and support the thesis statement,
and much of the information is obvious and needs more development.
x The writer’s conclusion is underdeveloped, missing, and/or does not reinforce the
thesis statement.
x The writer is beginning to arrange the main points in an order that is could suit the
claim made in the thesis statement, but the outline lacks organization and focus.
x The supporting elements provided for each main point lack are minimally defined and
do not illustrate the comparison and contrast pattern of development for the chosen
topic.
x The paper includes some errors that make it difficult for a reader to understand the
content and/or does not use the required font, header, line spacing, and margins.
Lesson: Prewriting: Comparison and Contrast Exam# 355104
Not
Developed score of 50%
The prewriting does not address the purpose of the assignment and the requirements of the
prompt.
x The writer did not choose one of the assigned topics and/or did not submit an outline or
graphic organizer.
x The writer did not include all the required introductory information: a topic,
background statement, and thesis statement.
x The thesis statement does not make a claim or takes a position on the topic.
x The writer did not include at least 3 main points on the topic, with at least three
supporting elements for each. The main points do not connect clearly to and support
the thesis statement
x The writer’s conclusion does not reinforce the thesis statement.
x The writer did not arrange the main points in a logical order to suit the claim made in
the thesis statement.
x The supporting elements are not provided for each main point and/or are not relevant
and adequately illustrate the comparison and contrast pattern of development for the
chosen topic.
x The paper includes significant errors that make it extremely difficult for a reader to
understand the content and does not use the required font, header, line spacing, and
margins.
Exam Number: 355104 Grade: 70
Date: 7/14/23 Instructor: SO
Instructions for Essay:
Thank you for your submission and hard work! You’re ready to move on to the formal essay.
Before you start drafting your essay, you should
Review the exam instructions in your study materials online.
1. Apply the feedback I’ve included above.
2. Use the same topic for your essay as you did in this prewriting. Do not switch topics.
The compare and contrast essay is a formal essay based on this prewriting assignment. The goal
is to compare and contrast your topic, make a debatable claim about that comparison, and prove
that claim in your essay. Your essay will need
x An introduction with a thesis statement.
x Body paragraphs with topic sentences that each focus on one category.
x A conclusion that includes your paraphrased thesis.
Lesson: Prewriting: Comparison and Contrast Exam# 355104
Review the feedback I’ve provided and apply it as you work on your formal essay, which should
be 1,000–1,200 words. If you have any questions as you work, don’t hesitate to let the school
know.
We want to hear from you! Please use this link to share your feedback with us. Best of luck in
your studies!
Topic: Comparing and contrasting online shopping and shopping at a physical location.
Background information: With the rise of technology, online shopping has become
increasingly popular, offering convenience and accessibility. However, traditional shopping at
physical locations still has its advantages in terms of sensory experiences and immediate product
availability.
Thesis Statement: Online shopping and shopping at a physical location differ in terms of
convenience, sensory experience, and product availability. Good thesis but it lacks an argument
as required. For example: Dogs make better pets than cats for solo-living introverts because
they provide emotional support, exercise, and security.
Point 1: Convenience
x Online shopping:
1. Can be done anytime and anywhere, providing a wide range of products at the
click of a button.
2. Allows for comparison shopping.
3. Eliminates the need to travel.
Formatted: Font: Bold, Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Lesson: Prewriting: Comparison and Contrast Exam# 355104
x Shopping at a physical location:
1. Requires visiting a store in person, which may involve travel and limited store
hours.
2. Provides immediate access to products.
3. The ability to physically examine and try them.
Point 2: Sensory Experience
x Online shopping:
1. Lacks the sensory experience of physically interacting with products.
2. Relies on product descriptions, images, and customer reviews.
3. No opportunity to feel textures, try on clothes, or test functionality.
x Shopping at a physical location:
1. Offers a multisensory experience, allowing customers to touch, see, and even
smell products.
2. Provides the opportunity to try on clothes, test out electronics.
3. Evaluate the quality firsthand.
Point 3: Product Availability
x Online shopping:
1. Provides a vast selection of products from various sellers, including those that
may be difficult to find locally.
2. Can easily compare prices and read customer reviews.
3. Some items may be out of stock or have long delivery times.
Lesson: Prewriting: Comparison and Contrast Exam# 355104
x Shopping at a physical location:
1. Offers immediate access to products, allowing customers to see and purchase
items on the spot.
2. Limited to the available inventory of a particular store.
3. Eliminates the need to wait for shipping.
Conclusion: While online shopping offers convenience and a wide range of options, shopping at
a physical location provides a sensory experience and immediate product availability. The choice
between the two depends on individual preferences, urgency, and the desire for personal
interaction with products. Good conclusion but your thesis must take a position.
Good effort.

Test

INSTRUCTIONS

  1. Read the Writing Guidelines on the next page of this booklet.
  2. Consider all three readings in this booklet. Select one to analyze.
  3. Use Booklet 1 for any outlining and draft work.
  4. In Booklet 2, write a800 -word essay about the reading you have selected.

 

READING 1: A personal essay

“For the Bird” by Brian Brett

Write an essay that develops a thesis statement about a main idea in Brett’s personal essay. In your

analysis of his text, be sure to explain how Brett uses literary techniques and devices to construct.

that idea. * Make specific references to the reading to support your interpretation.

 

English Assignment-33

 
   
 
   

Instructions

For this assignment, you first will identify a topic of interest that you might want to pursue for research. You are not tied to this topic when you reach the dissertation sequence, but it should be a topic that you find interesting now and also relates to your program andspecialization.   Please make sure you explicitly state your interest in this topic in your introduction.

Next, conduct a literature search using thelibrary to locate two studies examining your selected topic and in which the researchers used two different non-parametric statistics. In your search for articles, you should use any combination of the term “non-parametric” as well as the different tools discussed in this module (e.g., Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman, Friedman, etc.).

Once you have located your articles, you will prepare a short paper using the following format:

·         Introduction to the selected topic of interest

·         Brief summary of first article

·         Include research question, statistical test(s), and general findings

·         Brief summary of second article

·         Include research question, statistical test(s), and general findings

·         Synthesis

·         Specifically, compare and contrast the two articles, assessing the types of statistical methods and analysis used.  Make sure you fully understand and narrate why the researchers chose a non-parametric approach and in particular what tradeoffs they had to deal with.

·         Conclusion

·         Assess what approach you might take if you were to conduct a study in this topic area.  What circumstances would require non-parametric techniques?

Length: 4 pages including title page and reference page.

References:Include a minimum of 3 scholarly resources.

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 

 

 

COM: Audience Analysis Discussion

A key factor of good public speaking is understanding your audience. This is especially important when preparing arguments and persuasive appeals. Thus, for this activity you need to present the argument or thesis for your persuasive speech, and do a little audience analysis of your own based on comments in the discussion.

  1. Post a new thread with your topic/argument for your persuasive speech. Then, ask your classmates the following:
    1. Do you strongly agree, agree, undecided, disagree, or strongly disagree with this argument?
    2. What questions do you hope this speech answers?
    3. What more would you want to learn during the course of this speech?

English English Assignments

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: Write a 2-3 page paper analyzing the formal properties of
any artwork that interests you. The artwork chosen can be any unique painting,
sculpture, or photograph that has been publicly displayed in a gallery or museum. See
below for LOTS of further overviews and tips. Please feel free to ask any questions.
FORMAL ANALYSIS PAPER LEARNING OBJECTIVE: the goal of a formal analysis
is to explain how the formal elements of a work of art affect the representation of the
subject matter and expressive content. The emphasis should be on analyzing the
formal elements—not interpreting the artwork.
A formal analysis includes an analysis of the forms appearing in the work you have
chosen. These forms give the work its expression, message, or meaning. A formal
analysis assumes a work of art is (1) a constructed object (2) that has been created with
a stable meaning (even though it might not be clear to the viewer) (3) that can be
ascertained by studying the relationships between the elements of the work.
To aid in writing a formal analysis, you should think as if you were describing the work of
art to someone who has never seen it before. When your reader finishes reading your
analysis, they should have a complete mental picture of what the work looks like. Yet,
the formal analysis is more than just a description of the work. It should also include a
thesis statement that reflects your conclusions about the work. The thesis statement
may, in general, answer a question like these: What do I think is the meaning of this
work? What is the message that this work or artist sends to the viewer? What is this
work all about? The thesis statement is an important element of the analysis that sets it
apart from being a merely descriptive paper.
FORMAT FOR THE FORMAL ANALYSIS PAPER:
• 2.5-3 pages
• Double-spaced
• 12 pt. Times New Roman
• 1” borders.
• Make sure you proofread your paper for incorrect grammar, spelling, punctuation,
and other errors.
• In addition, make sure your paper includes a thesis statement. Your grade will
reflect your ability to follow these guidelines.
• At least one outside source—be sure to list the source.
SUGGESTED STRUCTURE FOR A FORMAL ANALYSIS PAPER:
Introduction: The introduction should identify the title of the work of art, the name of

the artist, and the date when it was created. You may also indicate the medium, the
period in which it was created, and its current location. While biographical information
about the artist is not necessary, if you know something about the artist’s interests or
the interests of the period that may have influenced this work, you may include it here.
Typically, your introduction should conclude with your thesis statement, which will
suggest the meaning or content of the work to introduce the formal elements you have
chosen to analyze.
• The Thesis Statement: Your thesis should provide a framework for your
analysis and suggest your interpretation of the work. A thesis statement
does not necessarily involve a view of argument or original insight, but it
should let the reader know how the artist’s formal choices affect the
viewer.
Body/Development of Formal Analysis Paper: In the most straightforward
organization, each element you discuss in your paper should be analyzed in its own
paragraph. You may find it helpful to begin each paragraph with a topic sentence about
the significance of the element and end with a concluding statement. You may also
organize your analyses of the formal elements according to major figures, a focal point,
or other significant effects in the composition.
• The Analysis: Although description is an important part of a formal analysis,
description is not enough on its own. You must introduce and
contextualize your descriptions of the formal elements of the work so the
reader understands how each element influences the work’s overall effect
on the viewer. You may include your emotional responses to a work, but
you must explain them and back them up with evidence, the formal
elements that elicit your emotional response (Barnet, 34).
Conclusion of Formal Analysis Paper: The conclusion may summarize your findings
and relate to the theme presented in your introduction; however, you should avoid
simply repeating what you offered in the introduction. You may also include any new
ideas, insights, or understandings you gained about the work through the analysis
process.
Note: All descriptions and analyses should relate to your thesis.
THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN WRITING A FORMAL ANALYSIS:
1. Record your first impression(s) of the artwork. What stands out? Is there a focal
point (an area to which the artist wants your eye to be drawn)? If so, what formal
elements led you to this conclusion? Your impressions can help you reach your thesis.
2. What is the subject of the artwork?
3. Composition: How are the parts of the work arranged? Is there a stable or unstable
composition? Is it dynamic? Full of movement? Or is it static?

  1. Pose: If the work has figures, are the proportions believable? Realistic? Describe the
    pose(s). Is the figure active, calm, graceful, stiff, tense, or relaxed? Does the figure
    convey a mood? If there are several figures, how do they relate to each other (do they
    interact? not?)?
    5. Proportions: Does the whole or even individual parts of the figure(s) or natural objects in
    the work look natural? Why did you come to this conclusion? 6. Line: Are the outlines
    (whether perceived or actual) smooth, fuzzy, or clear? Are the main lines vertical,
    horizontal, diagonal, curved, or a combination of any of these?
    6. Are the lines jagged and full of energy? Sketchy? Geometric? Curvilinear? Bold?
    Subtle?
    7. Space: If the artist conveys space, what type of space is used? What is the relation of the
    main figure to the space around it? Are the main figures entirely within the space (if the
    artwork is a painting), or are parts of the bodies cut off by the edge of the artwork? Is the
    setting illusionistic, as if one could enter the space of the painting, or is it flat and
    two-dimensional, a space that one could not possibly enter?
    8. Texture: If a sculpture, is the surface smooth and polished or rough? Are there several
    textures conveyed? Where and How? If a painting, is there any texture to the paint
    surface? Are the brushstrokes invisible? Brushy? Sketchy? Loose and flowing? Or tight
    and controlled?
    9. Light and Shadow: Are shadows visible? Where? Are there dark shadows, light
    shadows, or both? How do the shadows affect the work?
    10. Size: How big is the artwork? Are the figures or objects in the work life-sized, larger, or
    smaller than life? How does the size affect the work?
    11. Color: What type of colors are used in the work? Bright? Dull? Complimentary? Does the
    artist use colors to draw your attention to specific areas of the work? How? If a sculpture,
    examine the color(s) of the medium and how it affects the work.
    12. Mood: Do you sense an overall mood in the artwork? Perhaps several different moods? If
    so, describe them. How does the mood interpret how you view the work?
    For Help:
    •See Sylvan Barnett’s A Short Guide to Writing about Art – Thesis and formal
    analysis sections.
    •Remember that I am also available via Zoom office hours and email.
    Works Referenced: Barnet, Sylvan. A Short Guide to Writing About Art. Eighth Edition.
    Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.

 

Bible

Reflection Journal

Completion requirements

 Instructions

Exegete (i.e., critically interpret) conversation and discourse in casual or social spaces you frequent (either in person or digital).

  • What narratives are assumed, foundational, explored, repeated, questioned, challenged, or avoided?
  • How are divergent ideas (or those who hold them) discussed or treated?
  • What unwritten rules influence what conversation, stories, or ideas are acceptable or unacceptable?

Overall Instructions

Each week, submit a 1–2-page written journal that invites you to reflect on contexts and cultures within which you live and may one day do ministry, along with guided topical reflections. Make connections between each topic and the readings, videos, and discussions in the course.

Your journal each week invites you into observational reflection. Using specific examples to support your reflection as much as possible, explore, examine, and ultimately exegete your perspectives, assumptions, influences, experiences, questions, reactions, and growth as you engage the perspectives and stories of others who are both similar and different from you. Each week’s journal asks you to exegete (that is, expound and interpret) aspects of your context, similar to how you would exegete Scripture.

The following questions can further guide your observations and interpretation each week:

  1. What have I learned during readings, learning exercises, and efforts to hold tension between ideas in this course?
  2. What stands out to me as I exegete my world, my influences, my church, my library, and my own formation?
  3. What do I find challenging, uncomfortable, or unresolved?
  4. How am I choosing to adapt to new experiences or information?
  5. What am I feeling about opportunities for growth, change, and my own calling to ministry in a globalized world?